Multi-aged homeschooling

How I manage homeschooling with children across such a broad age range (10, 6, 4, 2 and 4 months) is probably the most common question I am asked.  It is also one of the more difficult ones for me to answer.  The hardest is “How do you get it all done?”  Because I don’t.  And really, the answer is the same regarding managing homeschooling different ages.

I simply don’t.  At least not in the way the other person seems to think.  Most people seem to be under the impression that having two school-aged children means I have two separate curricula to go through, while pulling off a little preschool with the four year old and keeping the younger two occupied as best I can.

Answering questions based on a misperception has always been difficult for me, especially when the conversation is with someone I scarcely know who is just curious about homeschooling.  Answering directly makes it sound like I’m not really doing anything with the younger children, while discussions regarding the differences between schooling and home education take longer than the normal social limits set on small talk.

Sometimes, I really do feel like I’m speaking a different language.

My eldest is really the only one who ever balks at homeschooling.  I made most of my mistakes with her, and there is a lot I would change about how we started if I could.  For the younger ones, however, it is all they’ve ever known.  They have grown up playing at my feet while Mouse and I discussed a book, went over math or tried a science experiment.  When they were old enough, they were drawn into the conversation.

Or more accurately, they demanded to be a part of it.  My two year old breaks down in tears if I call for the children to come to the table and I have nothing prepared for her.  My six year old wants to know more about everything and is continually asking me to write new things he has learned in his old lapbooks.

I teach and they learn what they are ready for.  But then there is this notion that somehow the younger children will miss out on something.  As if the fact we covered amphibians last month means we will never talk about them again and my younger children will grow into adulthood never knowing the life cycle of a frog.  But around here, no lesson is ever really over.  In fact, that is why we are drifting away from lapbooks.  They run out of room for all the additions my children want to make over time, and these additions represent something very important in education I want to encourage:  Just because the unit has ended doesn’t mean we are finished learning about the subject.

And that all goes to show that I should have foreseen the first real difficulty I’ve experienced teaching children of different ages together.  How, in all my planning, did I think I was going to get away with assigning The Hobbit as silent reading?  Barely into the introduction, as I mentioned that JRR Tolkein and C.S. Lewis were friends, I had the rapt attention of four little imaginations.

Send Mouse off with the book by herself?  I think there would have been a revolt and definite claims of favoritism.

Discussing diversity with the homeschooled child

Catholic Dads recently asked how other homeschool families discuss homeschooling with family, friends and paticularly with the homeschooled children.  Particularly the questions of children seem to draw out uncertainties.  After all, we have so much power to frame the entire discussion and insert our views into our children.  Catholic Dad’s questions echo my own thoughts as I attempt to answer my daughter’s questions:

But how do we explain this [the reasons we homeschool] to a five year old without a.) giving him the impression that he’s missing out on something fantastic, b.) running the risk that he looks down his nose at other kids who do go to school or c.)getting the impression that schools and everything associated with them are to be avoided?  Homeschool Diplomacy

They are good questions and the answers deserve some pondering.  After all, short of sending your children off to school for an extended period, any answer given will only be part of the story.  It’s like trying to explain a foreign culture without it coming down to food, holidays and national costumes.

I don’t have an answer.

Actually, I have more questions.  Essentially, they are the same questions, broadened and not specific to homeschoolers.  How do we explain differences and diversity to our children?  Whether it is a woman dressed in a sari, or with a hijab covering her head, a child with obvious physical deformities or a man behaving bizarrely on a street corner, how do you address the questions your children have?

As a child stands staring, the most common reaction I see from parents is a swift diversion and a muttered “It’s impolite to stare!” as the child is whisked away.  Now, it is impolite to stare, and an important part of raising children is teaching them these finer points of social life.  But in that moment, the child has also noticed something:  people are different.  We come in different colors, shapes and sizes, we have different customs, we speak different languages and some of us suffer from diseases and disorders that make us noticeably different.  Some of us are hurting, are hungry and even smell.

But it is impolite to stare, so we whisk our children away.

I’d be the last to say that it is appropriate to turn the person into an object lesson. . .although a man with a neck injury at McDonald’s once told me he never minded the children staring.  It was the parents shuttling them out of sight that got to him.  But I can’t help but wonder how many parents pick up the conversation with their children later.

I wonder, because a lot is learned in that moment.  A lot more than perhaps we realize.  It brings us back to that socialization issue homeschoolers are so fond of:

The process whereby a child learns to get along with and to behave similarly to other people in the group, largely through imitation as well as group pressure.  Answers.com

It is also a process which occurs without critical analysis.  That quick but firm redirection (with perhaps a touch of shock) may teach our children a lot more about our culture than simply that it is impolite to stare.  After all, there seem to be certain “things not spoken of” that we aren’t even supposed to look at.

But how do we (and how should we) discuss these issues with young children?

Suburban Chicago school district strikes a compromise with homeschoolers

This happens so rarely, I thought I should make note of it:  For once, I agree with the school district.

Mouse’s first interview

Check out my daughter’s interview over at The Creative Homeschool regarding her e-zine.  Just one more thing to add to the list of what she has been learning through blogging

Do we need a parental rights amendment?

Last week, Michael Farris tweeted that Senator Jim DeMint had introduced the parental rights amendment into the Senate, followed by a Friday tweet announcing that the parental rights amendment had garnered 100 supporters in the House.  After Michael Farris predicted that the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child (UNCRC) would come before the senate in the fall or spring, I figured the debate would begin heating up again.  Recent government actions in England and Sweden seem to have added a little fuel to the fire.

Eric Potter urges me to take a look at the Parental Rights Amendment, emphasizing:

Do not wait until our great nation becomes a nation where the government controls the minds and souls of our next generation.

Even Crimson Wife, of Bending the Twigs, who seems to be about as excited about a parental rights amendment as I am, is having second thoughts.

I’ve been on the fence when it comes the proposed Parental Rights Amendment but with the UNCRC being used as justification for proposed restrictions on homeschooling, I’m leaning more and more towards supporting it…

But do we really need a constitutional amendment to protect parental rights?  I know the argument.  Once signed and ratified, a treaty becomes the supreme law of the land, replacing state and federal law unless it directly contradicts something already in our Constitution.  The treaty in question of course being the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child.

I have a problem with this.  I have a problem with it for the reasons I mentioned last time I asked whether we really needed a parental rights amendment.  Now that this treaty may indeed come before the Senate in the near future (although maybe not quite as soon as Farris predicts), I have another problem with it–a serious one.

It is a distraction.

Ratifying the treaty requires 2/3 of the Senate to vote for it.  Sixty seven senators.  An amendment, on the other hand, will require 2/3 of the House, 2/3 of the Senate and 3/4 of the states to sign on to an amendment which hasn’t seen considerable success even at the state level.  At the federal level, it will stall for all the same reasons it stalled in state legislatures.  In the meantime, we will lose valuable time which we could be using to research the treaty, determine its strengths and weaknesses and formulate a reasoned response.

In other words, if we are afraid of the treaty, we should oppose the treaty, not use some “backdoor measure.”  Especially one with so little hope of success and one which may be built on a faulty foundation to begin with.  And perhaps we should take a page or two from the opposition’s playbook.

Looking specifically at the Parental Rights Amendment push in Colorado, conservatives were initially quite confident, with 76% of registered voters supporting it.  A number of organizations opposed the amendment, however they did not swing opinion from 76% in favor to 57% opposed by rallying their base and getting the information out.  Nor did they do it by introducing alternative legislation.  Instead, they spent some time researching beginning a full year before they expected the measure to be put on the ballot.

Immediately upon becoming campaign manager, Mendez urged the campaign to conduct a detailed statewide poll of voters’ reactions to the amendment. “It was one of the smartest things we did,” says deputy campaign manager Steadman, “because it told us what issues resonated with voters.”  The Gutmacher Institute

From this survey, they found that Colorado voters were indeed wary of the government overstepping its bounds with regards to parenting, but they also found several points about the amendment itself that concerned voters.  It was from these concerns that they developed their talking points rather than from the concerns of their own members.

The American Family Association, the Home School Legal Defense Association, and Eagle Forum, on the other hand, are very good at speaking the language of those who agree with them.  (I have little doubt this applies to many of the organizations on the Allied Organizations List.)  They know how to spread information and action points quickly and rally their base.  Unfortunately, after awhile it gets to be like yelling into an echo chamber.

Imagine if we were able to step out of that chamber and actually communicate with other parents. What if we could focus the discussion on what the average American parent worries about rather than what the average conservative, Christian homeschooler worries about?  Would it perhaps be conceivable, then, that we could end up with 34 senators opposed to ratification?

Because 34 senators is all we need if we can successfully hit the UNCRC directly.

Little kitten no name needs your help

…in finding a name, of course.  Mouse rejected the idea of calling the kitten “Mouse,” and dad scratched the very popular “Sassy” from the list.  After watching her this evening, I’m thinking Dust Bunny wouldn’t be a bad name.  She certainly likes them enough.  She is a beautiful little thing and looks like she has a bit of Siamese in her with those beautiful blue eyes, though mom is a tabby cat.

kitten

To inspire our creativity and give us a broader range of names not featured in either Dora the Explorer or Diego, Mouse is hosting her first contest and giveaway.  In exchange for name ideas, she will give a little something to one random commenter.  So hop on over to The Science Mouse and give us some ideas!

Government funded homeschooling

The Globe and Mail out of Canada has some nice commentary on homeschooling.  I particulary liked the fact that the author’s “conversion” to a supporter of homeschooling occured not after being inundated by statistics and well-crafted arguments.  Instead, she was confronted with a roomfull of homeschoolers in a homeschool information night at her library.

Seated beside a mom with coiffed hair, polished nails and an elegant suit, I listened wide-eyed as audience members talked about a world I had totally misunderstood and stereotyped.

. . .

None of them were hippies. None seemed overly religious or way out there. In fact, the only trait they shared was a conviction that they – as moms and dads – could better prepare their children for life.

She does have one question, however:

Research shows home-schooled kids outperform their public-school peers. So why so is there little or no financial encouragement for parents to take it on?

I don’t know how these things work up in Canada, but down here in the states I think the question is fairly easy to answer.  For the most part, we don’t want the money.  We don’t want the oversight and we don’t want the control.

We just want to be left alone to follow our convictions and educate our children in freedom.

Some previous discussion about tax credits, for the interested:

Federal tax credit for homeschoolers

MO looks at parental rights, tax credits for homeschoolers

Sweden proposes making homeschooling illegal

June 16, the new school law was presented to the Swedish minister of education.  Based on its understanding of the European Convention on Human Rights (itself based on the UN’s Universal Declaration of Human Rights), homeschooling will be made illegal.  The following is a letter forwarded to me from a homeschooler in Sweden:

*******************

Dear friends,

Today the Swedish Government released its suggestion for a new Swedish school law which has been in the works for many years.

The position on homeschooling in the suggested law is a return to darkness. It is unbelievable.  Homeschoolings will NOT be permitted for those referring to philosophical or religious reasons according to the European convention on Human Rights!

The reason given is:

“…that the education in school should be comprehensive and objective
and thereby designed so that all pupils can participate, regardless of
what religious or philosophical reasons the pupil or his or her care-
takers may have.”

Thus, the suggested law argues:

“…there is no need for the law to offer the possibility of
homeschooling because of religious or philosophical reasons in the
family. All together this means that this suggested change cannot be
said to contradict Swedens international obligations Human rights
conventions].”

The quotes above are my [the author of the original letter!] translations from the suggested law on page
584. The suggested law can be downloaded in Swedish from the Swedish Government homepage: http://www.regeringen.se/sb/d/11355/a/128290

The law is now out for review and The Swedish Association for Home Education - http://www.rohus.nu/?English_information- will give its suggestions to the Government. The review closes on September 25. The final law will be presented to Parliament during the spring of 2010 and will take effect in 2011.

That the Swedish Government is making homeschooling illegal is Sweden showing off its worst totalitarian socialist roots. We will need international support to show that Sweden, as a member of the international democratic community, cannot take such a position. As Sweden is often seen as the great social utopia of the world, it is important for Swedish homeschoolers to win this battle.

Sensible international suggestions about the new Swedish school law can be sent to: skollagen@education.ministry.se

You are welcome to contact me at: jonas@rohus.se or the whole Rohus board at: styrelsen@rohus.nu

Best regards

Jonas Himmelstrand
Member and pedagogical advisor of the Rohus board

*************************

Hopefully this does not go through, but from my understanding, homeschooling in Sweden is a very rare event.  According to A to Z Home’s Cool, there are only about 200 homeschooling families.  Like the situation in England, it appears that it is official interpretation of international treaties that is behind the attempt to restrict homeschooling.  At the same time, homeschoolers in Sweden are using the language of the Convention on the Rights of the Child as a defense.

Conservative's Forum - Conservative's News and Discussion Forum. Academics blogs Top Blogs HOMESCHOOL CENTRAL Top Parents blogs Academics Blogs - Blog Flare Crosswalk Directory Blog Directory & Search engine Blog Flux Directory Family & Home Blogs - Blogged Blog Directory
Powered by WebRing.