<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Some geographical reasoning</title>
	<atom:link href="http://principleddiscovery.com/2007/11/14/some-geographical-reasoning/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://principleddiscovery.com/2007/11/14/some-geographical-reasoning/</link>
	<description>If the foundations be destroyed, what shall the righteous do? --Psalm 11:3</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 00:54:22 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Doing it Differently Blog Carnival, 14th Edition : Today Is That Day</title>
		<link>http://principleddiscovery.com/2007/11/14/some-geographical-reasoning/comment-page-1/#comment-1065409</link>
		<dc:creator>Doing it Differently Blog Carnival, 14th Edition : Today Is That Day</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 14:24:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://principleddiscovery.com/?p=691#comment-1065409</guid>
		<description>[...] Discovery - Some geographical reasoning Learn a foreign language - How to learn Spanish when you&#8217;ve got no [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Discovery &#8211; Some geographical reasoning Learn a foreign language &#8211; How to learn Spanish when you&rsquo;ve got no [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack's Porch</title>
		<link>http://principleddiscovery.com/2007/11/14/some-geographical-reasoning/comment-page-1/#comment-3385</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack's Porch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Nov 2007 14:42:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://principleddiscovery.com/?p=691#comment-3385</guid>
		<description>Do the Kings of the North come against Israel, but the Lord Jesus Christ will enter through the East Gate?

-------------------------------------------

The image created by the eye is real and inverted. Many people are surprised to learn that the images we always see are inverted. The reason we do not notice this is that we know no other reality.

http://library.thinkquest.org/27066/theeye/nlstructure.html

------------------------------------------

Hence the definition of invert in Merriam Websters online dictionary means only one thing:

AUSTRALIA IS ON TOP, and the Northern Hemisphere is NOT.

Invert:

1 a: to reverse in position, order, or relationship b: to subject to inversion
2 a: to turn inside out or upside down b: to turn inward

-------------------------------------------

But since North is up is your reality, we will let you live in your delusions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do the Kings of the North come against Israel, but the Lord Jesus Christ will enter through the East Gate?</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-</p>
<p>The image created by the eye is real and inverted. Many people are surprised to learn that the images we always see are inverted. The reason we do not notice this is that we know no other reality.</p>
<p><a href="http://library.thinkquest.org/27066/theeye/nlstructure.html" rel="nofollow">http://library.thinkquest.org/27066/theeye/nlstructure.html</a></p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;</p>
<p>Hence the definition of invert in Merriam Websters online dictionary means only one thing:</p>
<p>AUSTRALIA IS ON TOP, and the Northern Hemisphere is NOT.</p>
<p>Invert:</p>
<p>1 a: to reverse in position, order, or relationship b: to subject to inversion<br />
2 a: to turn inside out or upside down b: to turn inward</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-</p>
<p>But since North is up is your reality, we will let you live in your delusions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dana</title>
		<link>http://principleddiscovery.com/2007/11/14/some-geographical-reasoning/comment-page-1/#comment-3361</link>
		<dc:creator>Dana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2007 04:08:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://principleddiscovery.com/?p=691#comment-3361</guid>
		<description>All in fun, Mrs. Mecomber.  I enjoyed looking the stuff up.  Just to be clear, I never questioned the concept of north and south, just how that relates to &quot;up&quot; and &quot;down.&quot;

Thanks for your insight into the language, Julie!

And thank you, Brian.  I didn&#039;t really have a point when I started the entry, but as I wrote it, the argument did seem more like those I read defending public school.  Basically that it is the way it is and therefore it is right. : )</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All in fun, Mrs. Mecomber.  I enjoyed looking the stuff up.  Just to be clear, I never questioned the concept of north and south, just how that relates to &#8220;up&#8221; and &#8220;down.&#8221;</p>
<p>Thanks for your insight into the language, Julie!</p>
<p>And thank you, Brian.  I didn&#8217;t really have a point when I started the entry, but as I wrote it, the argument did seem more like those I read defending public school.  Basically that it is the way it is and therefore it is right. : )</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Nash</title>
		<link>http://principleddiscovery.com/2007/11/14/some-geographical-reasoning/comment-page-1/#comment-3359</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Nash</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2007 03:39:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://principleddiscovery.com/?p=691#comment-3359</guid>
		<description>I couldn&#039;t agree with you more about public school being the norm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I couldn&#8217;t agree with you more about public school being the norm</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julie@Shanan Trail</title>
		<link>http://principleddiscovery.com/2007/11/14/some-geographical-reasoning/comment-page-1/#comment-3358</link>
		<dc:creator>Julie@Shanan Trail</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2007 02:09:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://principleddiscovery.com/?p=691#comment-3358</guid>
		<description>Actually the word translated &quot;north&quot; in the Old Testament is more correctly translated left. By orienting yourself to the east (toward the rising sun) left is, well, north. The translators used north because that is how it would make sense to those of us who didn&#039;t know maps were to be drawn facing east.

Up is tricky in the Old Testament. No matter what the starting point was ~ the Bible seems to always use the word up to signify traveling to Jerusalem. I think this is spiritual rather than directional ~ 

What a fun entry! I have enjoyed the comments ~</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually the word translated &#8220;north&#8221; in the Old Testament is more correctly translated left. By orienting yourself to the east (toward the rising sun) left is, well, north. The translators used north because that is how it would make sense to those of us who didn&#8217;t know maps were to be drawn facing east.</p>
<p>Up is tricky in the Old Testament. No matter what the starting point was ~ the Bible seems to always use the word up to signify traveling to Jerusalem. I think this is spiritual rather than directional ~ </p>
<p>What a fun entry! I have enjoyed the comments ~</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: H. M.</title>
		<link>http://principleddiscovery.com/2007/11/14/some-geographical-reasoning/comment-page-1/#comment-3357</link>
		<dc:creator>H. M.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2007 01:45:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://principleddiscovery.com/?p=691#comment-3357</guid>
		<description>Hmmm. Interesting thoughts.

No up? Is there a difference between &quot;north&quot; and &quot;up&quot;? Just wondering. I guess (I am not Einstein) that if the universe does not stretch on for eternity, there would have to be some sort of &quot;up&quot;-direction. 

I know this discussion is not crucial, but it certainly is mind-boggling.

According to popular legend, when the British laid down their arms at Yorktown, at the ceremony of surrender in 1781, the British regiments played the tune &quot;The World Turned Upside Down.&quot; Part of the song went like this:

&quot;If grass ate oxen and horses rode men,
&quot;The whole world would be turned upside down.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmm. Interesting thoughts.</p>
<p>No up? Is there a difference between &#8220;north&#8221; and &#8220;up&#8221;? Just wondering. I guess (I am not Einstein) that if the universe does not stretch on for eternity, there would have to be some sort of &#8220;up&#8221;-direction. </p>
<p>I know this discussion is not crucial, but it certainly is mind-boggling.</p>
<p>According to popular legend, when the British laid down their arms at Yorktown, at the ceremony of surrender in 1781, the British regiments played the tune &#8220;The World Turned Upside Down.&#8221; Part of the song went like this:</p>
<p>&#8220;If grass ate oxen and horses rode men,<br />
&#8220;The whole world would be turned upside down.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mrs. Mecomber</title>
		<link>http://principleddiscovery.com/2007/11/14/some-geographical-reasoning/comment-page-1/#comment-3356</link>
		<dc:creator>Mrs. Mecomber</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2007 01:36:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://principleddiscovery.com/?p=691#comment-3356</guid>
		<description>Depending on your perspective, Jesus just may be sitting on the Left Hand of the throne! ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Depending on your perspective, Jesus just may be sitting on the Left Hand of the throne! <img src='http://principleddiscovery.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mrs. Mecomber</title>
		<link>http://principleddiscovery.com/2007/11/14/some-geographical-reasoning/comment-page-1/#comment-3354</link>
		<dc:creator>Mrs. Mecomber</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2007 01:22:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://principleddiscovery.com/?p=691#comment-3354</guid>
		<description>P.S. In the Old Testament, God talks about the &quot;north&quot; and uses &quot;up.&quot; I tend to put weight on that. :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>P.S. In the Old Testament, God talks about the &#8220;north&#8221; and uses &#8220;up.&#8221; I tend to put weight on that. <img src='http://principleddiscovery.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mrs. Mecomber</title>
		<link>http://principleddiscovery.com/2007/11/14/some-geographical-reasoning/comment-page-1/#comment-3353</link>
		<dc:creator>Mrs. Mecomber</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2007 01:19:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://principleddiscovery.com/?p=691#comment-3353</guid>
		<description>Woohoo my comments have madeit to a post! I&#039;m famous!

Actually, I didn&#039;t truly &quot;take issue&quot; with MacArthur&#039;s map. I challeneged the challenge. I think Stan (above in comments) makes a good point, and Elisheva just reiterates what I said in the previous post: there is a physical dimension to north and south, and it is partly that dimension that constitutes &quot;up.&quot; Also, I did challenge your opinion on the sailors and the North Star and Paradise. 

As always, a good post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Woohoo my comments have madeit to a post! I&#8217;m famous!</p>
<p>Actually, I didn&#8217;t truly &#8220;take issue&#8221; with MacArthur&#8217;s map. I challeneged the challenge. I think Stan (above in comments) makes a good point, and Elisheva just reiterates what I said in the previous post: there is a physical dimension to north and south, and it is partly that dimension that constitutes &#8220;up.&#8221; Also, I did challenge your opinion on the sailors and the North Star and Paradise. </p>
<p>As always, a good post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dana</title>
		<link>http://principleddiscovery.com/2007/11/14/some-geographical-reasoning/comment-page-1/#comment-3341</link>
		<dc:creator>Dana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2007 02:56:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://principleddiscovery.com/?p=691#comment-3341</guid>
		<description>Nice addition to the discussion, Elisheva Levin!  Thank you!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice addition to the discussion, Elisheva Levin!  Thank you!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
