<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Book discussion on Homeschool:  And American History</title>
	<atom:link href="http://principleddiscovery.com/2008/08/06/book-discussion-on-homeschool-and-american-history/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://principleddiscovery.com/2008/08/06/book-discussion-on-homeschool-and-american-history/</link>
	<description>If the foundations be destroyed, what shall the righteous do? --Psalm 11:3</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 17:00:22 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Principled Discovery &#187; Short bloggy break</title>
		<link>http://principleddiscovery.com/2008/08/06/book-discussion-on-homeschool-and-american-history/#comment-995610</link>
		<dc:creator>Principled Discovery &#187; Short bloggy break</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 13:56:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://principleddiscovery.com/?p=1035#comment-995610</guid>
		<description>[...] to be back to normal blogging Monday, however I will still try to get up at least one chapter of Homeschool:  An American History up before then.  I fell behind last week due to icky pregnancy stuff and having more to do to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to be back to normal blogging Monday, however I will still try to get up at least one chapter of Homeschool:  An American History up before then.  I fell behind last week due to icky pregnancy stuff and having more to do to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dana</title>
		<link>http://principleddiscovery.com/2008/08/06/book-discussion-on-homeschool-and-american-history/#comment-982777</link>
		<dc:creator>Dana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 19:27:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://principleddiscovery.com/?p=1035#comment-982777</guid>
		<description>It is a difficult balance.  And I think that is part of why the "closed communion" model seems to have become what it is and as influential as it is.  There is a whole worldview unifying participants rather than "just" homeschooling.  And then their political activity, should there be any, also goes beyond "just" homeschooling.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is a difficult balance.  And I think that is part of why the &#8220;closed communion&#8221; model seems to have become what it is and as influential as it is.  There is a whole worldview unifying participants rather than &#8220;just&#8221; homeschooling.  And then their political activity, should there be any, also goes beyond &#8220;just&#8221; homeschooling.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CircleReader</title>
		<link>http://principleddiscovery.com/2008/08/06/book-discussion-on-homeschool-and-american-history/#comment-982769</link>
		<dc:creator>CircleReader</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 19:10:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://principleddiscovery.com/?p=1035#comment-982769</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;"This is not to say that restrictive groups are bad. It is to say that it is worth considering the purpose of the restrictions and if all activities need to be governed by the restriction."&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Yes! And I'd argue that participating with each other in the day-to-day, as much as possible, and with conscious respect for areas of "non-communion," is  a strong foundation for developing respect from the larger society and increasing our  capacity for constructive action at the state and national level. 

But that's a hard dance to do, if you want to raise kids "unstained by the world," so closed groups provide some shelter from the dangers and challenges of dealing with outsiders.

On the other hand, it is really hard to organize a group that has "open" membership and still has passionate, active participants. So it's no wonder that groups tend to close themselves one way or another...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>&#8220;This is not to say that restrictive groups are bad. It is to say that it is worth considering the purpose of the restrictions and if all activities need to be governed by the restriction.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>Yes! And I&#8217;d argue that participating with each other in the day-to-day, as much as possible, and with conscious respect for areas of &#8220;non-communion,&#8221; is  a strong foundation for developing respect from the larger society and increasing our  capacity for constructive action at the state and national level. </p>
<p>But that&#8217;s a hard dance to do, if you want to raise kids &#8220;unstained by the world,&#8221; so closed groups provide some shelter from the dangers and challenges of dealing with outsiders.</p>
<p>On the other hand, it is really hard to organize a group that has &#8220;open&#8221; membership and still has passionate, active participants. So it&#8217;s no wonder that groups tend to close themselves one way or another&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sebastian (a lady)</title>
		<link>http://principleddiscovery.com/2008/08/06/book-discussion-on-homeschool-and-american-history/#comment-982738</link>
		<dc:creator>Sebastian (a lady)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 17:15:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://principleddiscovery.com/?p=1035#comment-982738</guid>
		<description>I think that a lot of the heartache over groups that place a qualification on membership, be it religious/philosophical, pedigogical or topical, is the sense of exclusion that some families feel on a wider level, especially if there aren't other support alternatives.

It's one thing to say that a group of like minded moms are going to have a women's Bible study while there kids practice Spanish or that there is a book sale that promotes secular titles and attachment parenting works.  It is perceived differently when the homeschool swim lessons or band or science fair are organized by (and only open to) a restrictive group.

This is not to say that restrictive groups are bad.  It is to say that it is worth considering the purpose of the restrictions and if all activities need to be governed by the restriction.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that a lot of the heartache over groups that place a qualification on membership, be it religious/philosophical, pedigogical or topical, is the sense of exclusion that some families feel on a wider level, especially if there aren&#8217;t other support alternatives.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s one thing to say that a group of like minded moms are going to have a women&#8217;s Bible study while there kids practice Spanish or that there is a book sale that promotes secular titles and attachment parenting works.  It is perceived differently when the homeschool swim lessons or band or science fair are organized by (and only open to) a restrictive group.</p>
<p>This is not to say that restrictive groups are bad.  It is to say that it is worth considering the purpose of the restrictions and if all activities need to be governed by the restriction.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dana</title>
		<link>http://principleddiscovery.com/2008/08/06/book-discussion-on-homeschool-and-american-history/#comment-982539</link>
		<dc:creator>Dana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 02:49:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://principleddiscovery.com/?p=1035#comment-982539</guid>
		<description>I disagree.  Yes, the terms are borrowed from a theological point, but they are used a-theologically in an attempt to get away from "exclusivist" and "inclusivist" which inherently place a value judgment on those who exclude on whatever basis.  And away from "Christian" and "secular" which isn't accurate.

And I don't think homeschooling has a single heart.  We homeschool for very different reasons...and I don't think the terminology is shaping thought so much as attempting to label something we all see in homeschooling as two somewhat opposing camps, but isn't easy to distinguish.  

The thing is, I don't really think we need to have a single heart, nor necessarily get together and assist each other with the daily aspects of homeschooling.  People should feel free to organize themselves into groups based on any common conviction, whether it be strictly "homeschooling" or a complete statement of faith.  For me, the question isn't really that relevant when we are talking about the local support group meeting in the basement of the local church and starts with prayer vs. the one that meets at McDonald's and has as one of its rules that no one speaks of religious matters.  

For me, the issue becomes important when we are talking about statewide organizations.  These are the groups contacting legislators and providing the initial information when new laws are being proposed.  So far as I know, here in Nebraska, the closed communion Christian statewide organization is all that there is.  I don't have any real issues with them related to their closed communionness, because so far as I can tell their beliefs line up with mine well enough.  Not that I've spent all that much time researching their stances, or anything, and I've never attended their conventions, but should they be the only ones working with the legislature?  

But then, it isn't really their fault, I don't think, that no other groups have been organized to date.  According to the state, there are less than 6,000 homeschoolers in NE...not a lot to draw from for starting statewide organizations.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I disagree.  Yes, the terms are borrowed from a theological point, but they are used a-theologically in an attempt to get away from &#8220;exclusivist&#8221; and &#8220;inclusivist&#8221; which inherently place a value judgment on those who exclude on whatever basis.  And away from &#8220;Christian&#8221; and &#8220;secular&#8221; which isn&#8217;t accurate.</p>
<p>And I don&#8217;t think homeschooling has a single heart.  We homeschool for very different reasons&#8230;and I don&#8217;t think the terminology is shaping thought so much as attempting to label something we all see in homeschooling as two somewhat opposing camps, but isn&#8217;t easy to distinguish.  </p>
<p>The thing is, I don&#8217;t really think we need to have a single heart, nor necessarily get together and assist each other with the daily aspects of homeschooling.  People should feel free to organize themselves into groups based on any common conviction, whether it be strictly &#8220;homeschooling&#8221; or a complete statement of faith.  For me, the question isn&#8217;t really that relevant when we are talking about the local support group meeting in the basement of the local church and starts with prayer vs. the one that meets at McDonald&#8217;s and has as one of its rules that no one speaks of religious matters.  </p>
<p>For me, the issue becomes important when we are talking about statewide organizations.  These are the groups contacting legislators and providing the initial information when new laws are being proposed.  So far as I know, here in Nebraska, the closed communion Christian statewide organization is all that there is.  I don&#8217;t have any real issues with them related to their closed communionness, because so far as I can tell their beliefs line up with mine well enough.  Not that I&#8217;ve spent all that much time researching their stances, or anything, and I&#8217;ve never attended their conventions, but should they be the only ones working with the legislature?  </p>
<p>But then, it isn&#8217;t really their fault, I don&#8217;t think, that no other groups have been organized to date.  According to the state, there are less than 6,000 homeschoolers in NE&#8230;not a lot to draw from for starting statewide organizations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CircleReader</title>
		<link>http://principleddiscovery.com/2008/08/06/book-discussion-on-homeschool-and-american-history/#comment-982503</link>
		<dc:creator>CircleReader</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 00:22:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://principleddiscovery.com/?p=1035#comment-982503</guid>
		<description>When we started homeschooling, my wife would come home from meetings with our inclusive group in Chicago and say, "I just don't know how all those people can be in the room with each other!" 

She meant it as a compliment, and we think the answer is that they just practiced doing it regularly, and developed civil habits of mutual respect. We are very aware that the positive tone in that group was something special, since we've experienced the opposite from &lt;em&gt;both&lt;/em&gt; non-religious and Christian homeschooling groups.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When we started homeschooling, my wife would come home from meetings with our inclusive group in Chicago and say, &#8220;I just don&#8217;t know how all those people can be in the room with each other!&#8221; </p>
<p>She meant it as a compliment, and we think the answer is that they just practiced doing it regularly, and developed civil habits of mutual respect. We are very aware that the positive tone in that group was something special, since we&#8217;ve experienced the opposite from <em>both</em> non-religious and Christian homeschooling groups.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CircleReader</title>
		<link>http://principleddiscovery.com/2008/08/06/book-discussion-on-homeschool-and-american-history/#comment-982501</link>
		<dc:creator>CircleReader</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 00:16:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://principleddiscovery.com/?p=1035#comment-982501</guid>
		<description>Hmm-I am uncomfortable with the terminology. Among Christian denominations, both "closed communion" and "open communion" (my background) have very specific, positive meanings, and affirm a common commitment among those to whom the term applies. With home education, does "open communion" mean anything beyond, "We're not those folks?" If one group is "faith-centered," would you want to call the other group "learner centered?"

Evocative as they are, the terms seem to frame the difference unevenly, somehow, on footing that assumes ideology, rather than educational integrity, is the most important thing. This  is, of course, the point at issue. Broadening that point of contention out to a general classification scheme could lead us astray. 

I wonder what we are missing or obfuscating by using terminology borrowed from doctrinal debates? Is this situation really a &lt;em&gt;doctrinal&lt;/em&gt; one for all homeschoolers? (I think it may be so, if we include our convictions about the nature and purpose of education as "doctrine.") What is the difference between a "closed communion" homeschool group (we are enthusiastic members of a couple of those) and "closed communion" homeschooling as a practice of cultural isolation / separation (to which our family would be strongly opposed)? Can "open communion" homeschoolers feel free to engage with their religious convictions (Christian or otherwise) in the context of an open group that may not share those convictions? Or do they have to keep so-called "non-academic" issues fenced inside one "closed" group or another?  Can a "closed communion" homeschooler get handwriting tips from a pagan mom? If open vs. closed is the defining issue for specific organizations, but not for home educators as such, then what is at the heart of homeschooling? Does it have a single heart? If we didn't use these terms, what would we use? 

It may indeed reflect established social practice on the ground; but as with the term "homeschooling" itself, if we want to have the possibility of learning from and changing our homeschooling practices, I think we should be wary of how our terminology shapes our thinking.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm-I am uncomfortable with the terminology. Among Christian denominations, both &#8220;closed communion&#8221; and &#8220;open communion&#8221; (my background) have very specific, positive meanings, and affirm a common commitment among those to whom the term applies. With home education, does &#8220;open communion&#8221; mean anything beyond, &#8220;We&#8217;re not those folks?&#8221; If one group is &#8220;faith-centered,&#8221; would you want to call the other group &#8220;learner centered?&#8221;</p>
<p>Evocative as they are, the terms seem to frame the difference unevenly, somehow, on footing that assumes ideology, rather than educational integrity, is the most important thing. This  is, of course, the point at issue. Broadening that point of contention out to a general classification scheme could lead us astray. </p>
<p>I wonder what we are missing or obfuscating by using terminology borrowed from doctrinal debates? Is this situation really a <em>doctrinal</em> one for all homeschoolers? (I think it may be so, if we include our convictions about the nature and purpose of education as &#8220;doctrine.&#8221;) What is the difference between a &#8220;closed communion&#8221; homeschool group (we are enthusiastic members of a couple of those) and &#8220;closed communion&#8221; homeschooling as a practice of cultural isolation / separation (to which our family would be strongly opposed)? Can &#8220;open communion&#8221; homeschoolers feel free to engage with their religious convictions (Christian or otherwise) in the context of an open group that may not share those convictions? Or do they have to keep so-called &#8220;non-academic&#8221; issues fenced inside one &#8220;closed&#8221; group or another?  Can a &#8220;closed communion&#8221; homeschooler get handwriting tips from a pagan mom? If open vs. closed is the defining issue for specific organizations, but not for home educators as such, then what is at the heart of homeschooling? Does it have a single heart? If we didn&#8217;t use these terms, what would we use? </p>
<p>It may indeed reflect established social practice on the ground; but as with the term &#8220;homeschooling&#8221; itself, if we want to have the possibility of learning from and changing our homeschooling practices, I think we should be wary of how our terminology shapes our thinking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dana</title>
		<link>http://principleddiscovery.com/2008/08/06/book-discussion-on-homeschool-and-american-history/#comment-982498</link>
		<dc:creator>Dana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 00:06:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://principleddiscovery.com/?p=1035#comment-982498</guid>
		<description>I didn't have to read that twice, if it is any consolation to you. :)  And to be honest, as much as I like the idea of inclusive homeschool groups, I've never really felt welcome among them.  I always feel like I need to guard what I say, and swallow a lot of "Christian bashing."  Of course, most of the inclusive groups I've had contact with are strictly via the Internet, and discussion there takes a little different form than among people you actually know and see once in awhile.

The show is downloadable.  My dad downloads it to his MP3, so I know you can do it.  I will check specifically on IPod.  Some of the shows are available on Itunes, but not mine, yet.  I think that is something that is being developed, but at the moment I think only the bigger shows are on it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I didn&#8217;t have to read that twice, if it is any consolation to you. <img src='http://principleddiscovery.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  And to be honest, as much as I like the idea of inclusive homeschool groups, I&#8217;ve never really felt welcome among them.  I always feel like I need to guard what I say, and swallow a lot of &#8220;Christian bashing.&#8221;  Of course, most of the inclusive groups I&#8217;ve had contact with are strictly via the Internet, and discussion there takes a little different form than among people you actually know and see once in awhile.</p>
<p>The show is downloadable.  My dad downloads it to his MP3, so I know you can do it.  I will check specifically on IPod.  Some of the shows are available on Itunes, but not mine, yet.  I think that is something that is being developed, but at the moment I think only the bigger shows are on it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sebastian (a lady)</title>
		<link>http://principleddiscovery.com/2008/08/06/book-discussion-on-homeschool-and-american-history/#comment-982489</link>
		<dc:creator>Sebastian (a lady)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 23:29:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://principleddiscovery.com/?p=1035#comment-982489</guid>
		<description>Dana,
An interesting thread for a show might be homeschool groups who are closed communion about only accepting inclusive homeschoolers.  I realize that may take reading once or twice.  

For a while in the DC area, I was on an email list for homeschooling that initially required members to be members of a homeschool group that was specifically inclusive.

They did eventually change the requirements for the email list to individual members being tolerant and respectful of other viewpoints. But I did find the initial requirement to be an interesting reaction.

Anyway, I really came here to ask if you could post ways of getting the show onto an ipod. I'm much more likely to listen while cleaning than sit at the computer to listen. I didn't find it on iTunes yet. Is the show downloadable or only playable as streaming audio?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dana,<br />
An interesting thread for a show might be homeschool groups who are closed communion about only accepting inclusive homeschoolers.  I realize that may take reading once or twice.  </p>
<p>For a while in the DC area, I was on an email list for homeschooling that initially required members to be members of a homeschool group that was specifically inclusive.</p>
<p>They did eventually change the requirements for the email list to individual members being tolerant and respectful of other viewpoints. But I did find the initial requirement to be an interesting reaction.</p>
<p>Anyway, I really came here to ask if you could post ways of getting the show onto an ipod. I&#8217;m much more likely to listen while cleaning than sit at the computer to listen. I didn&#8217;t find it on iTunes yet. Is the show downloadable or only playable as streaming audio?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dana</title>
		<link>http://principleddiscovery.com/2008/08/06/book-discussion-on-homeschool-and-american-history/#comment-982394</link>
		<dc:creator>Dana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 15:48:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://principleddiscovery.com/?p=1035#comment-982394</guid>
		<description>Yes, "closed communion" refers to those who require a statement of faith or something similar and exclude others while "open communion" refers to those groups which accept anyone regardless of faith, etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, &#8220;closed communion&#8221; refers to those who require a statement of faith or something similar and exclude others while &#8220;open communion&#8221; refers to those groups which accept anyone regardless of faith, etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
